The High Court of Delhi set aside an order of the Rent Control Tribunal dismissing a landlord's eviction petition under Section 14(1)(a) of the DRCA, directing parties to proceed to trial on merits before the affected authority.
Order of the RCT setting aside the ARC order was set aside; parties directed to proceed with eviction matter on merits before ARC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
Impugned judgment is dated 31.10.2011. The RCT had set aside the order passed by the ARC dated 23.12.2010. This was an eviction proceeding filed by the landlord/respondent under Section 14(1)(a) of the DRCA.
After some arguments, it has been agreed that the impugned order be set aside. Accordingly, order dated 31.10.2011 is set aside. Parties to appear before the ARC on the date already fixed who shall proceed with the matter on merits.
During the pendency of the proceedings, third party interest shall not be created by the petitioner/alleged tenant.
Petition disposed of in the above terms.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
FEBRUARY 15, 2016 ndn
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to set aside the RCT order dismissing the landlord's eviction petition under the DRCA.
Whether to direct the parties to proceed with the eviction matter on merits before the ARC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ANWAR ALI
SARASWATI DEVI
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
