The court disposed of a revision petition and a connected CM application by recording an agreed timeline for the petitioner to vacate the suit godown and undertake user charges pending handover of possession.
Petitioner ordered to vacate premises by 31.12.2016 and pay user charges via affidavit undertaking.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
Through Mr.Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Alok Tripathi, Avocate.
versus RAEESUDDIN ..... Respondent Through Mr.T.S.Upadhyay, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
C.M. No.6682/2015 (for subsequent events)
Not pressed. Dismissed as withdrawn.
RC.REV. 125/2014, C.M. No.5360/2015 & C.M. No.6682/2015
After some arguments, it has been agreed that the godown in the property bearing no.5899-5900, Basti Harphool Singh, Qasabpura Sadar Bazar, Delhi-11006 will be vacated by the petitioner on or before 31.12.2016. In this intervening period user charges @ Rs.15,000/- per month shall be paid by the petitioner to the landlord. At the time of handing over vacant and physical possession of the suit premises to the landlord all electricity and water charges shall be cleared by the petitioner. Petitioner undertakes to pay the user charges on or before 7th day of each english calendar month.
All these facts shall be incorporated in an undertaking in the form of an affidavit to be furnished by the petitioner within a period
of 10 days from today with advance copy to the respondent/landlord.
Petition disposed of.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2016 ndn
Surrender Mohan Gambhir
Raeesuddin
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
