The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition as withdrawn after the petitioners received full compensation in a related matter involving Writer Safegaurd Ltd.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SEEMA AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Aruna Mehta, Advocate
versus
MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
%
O R D E R 22.01.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition in view of the compensation received in full and final settlement by the petitioners in the matter of Writer Safegaurd Ltd. v. Commissioner Under Employees Compensation Act FAO 154/2013.
This petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
JANUARY 22, 2016 rsk
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writer Safegaurd Ltd. v. Commissioner Under Employees Compensation ActReferred
Seema and Ors.
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam
J.R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
