Yadvendra Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the writ petition; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
Through: Mr. Shanker Raju, Advocate alongwith Mr. Nilansh Gaur, Advocate.
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC alongwith Mr. Pradeep Disodia, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R % 11.01.2016
After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
JANUARY 11, 2016
sapna
Yadvendra Singh
Union of India
S. Ravindra Bhat
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court