The Joint Registrar (Judicial) adjourned an application for clarification to 04.11.2024 due to unavailability of the plaintiff's main counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
MR ASHISH JOGINDER SINGH .....Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Alok Gupta & Mr. Ranjeet Singh Advs. (through VC)
versus
MS SHARDA JOGINDER SINGH & ANR .....Defendant Through: None
CORAM:
JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) MS. TYAGITA SINGH, (DHJS)
O R D E R
% 12.08.2024
Matter is taken up through physical hearing as well as video conferencing.
Regular steno is on leave today.
This is a decided case.
IA no.9974/2022 (application under Section 151 CPC moved by the plaintiff for clarification)
Learned proxy counsel for the plaintiff sought adjournment on the ground that main counsel is not available today.
Be fixed for further hearing on 04.11.2024.
TYAGITA SINGH, (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
AUGUST 12, 2024/ ab
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/08/2024 at 11:45:38
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
