Petitioner withdrew the writ petition. The court allowed an exemption application and dismissed the withdrawal petition as withdrawn on seeking withdrawal.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; Exemption allowed subject to exceptions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
..... Petitioner
versus
THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gigi C. George, Adv. with Mr. R.N. Tripathi, Adv. & Mr. S.S. Sejwal, Law Officer (CRPF)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
CM No.33442/2016(for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 8073/2016 & CM No.33443/2016 (for stay)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition as well as accompanying application is dismissed as withdrawn.
INDIRA BANERJEE, J
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 /ak
Sumati Devi
The Union of India
Indira Banerjee
V. Kameswar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
