The High Court of Delhi dismissed a withdrawn writ petition regarding a transfer post. The court ordered the respondent authorities to give the petitioner seven days to join the transferred position.
The respondent authorities shall allow the writ petitioner seven days time to join the transferred post.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
ASHOK KUMAR MISHRA ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Pabkahar Srivastava, Adv. and Mr. Hari Sharan Singh, Adv. (Govt. Pleader) for R1 to R3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 09.09.2016
After some arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition.
The writ petition with pending application is dismissed as withdrawn.
The respondent authorities shall, however, allow the writ petitioner
seven days time to join the transferred post.
INDIRA BANERJEE, J
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SEPTEMBER 09, 2016 /jg
Ashok Kumar Mishra
Union of India
Indira Banerjee
V. Kameswar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
