The High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition challenging the review medical board's decision to disqualify the petitioner from CISF appointment due to an unhealed ulcer, holding the court cannot appeal medical expert opinions in the absence of malafides or patent error.
The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6 (13.09.2016)
Through: Mr.Lalit Kumar, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Bhagwan Swarup Shukla with Mr.Suresh Prasad Chaurasiya, GP, Ms.Priti, Advs. for UOI
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R % 14.09.2016
appointment.
WP(C) 10826/2015
page 1 of 2
INDIRA BANERJEE, J
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 RN
page 2 of 2
WP(C) 10826/2015
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere with the report of the Review Medical Board disqualifying the petitioner for lack of fitness.
Whether there is malafides or patent apparent error in the medical findings warranting judicial review.
Whether the petitioner, seeking a job in combatised force, meets the high standard of medical fitness required.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vivek Choudhary
Union of India and Ors.
Indira Banerjee
V. Kameswar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
