Petitioner challenged fitness disqualification by Appeal Medical Board and claimed equal treatment with candidate Subham Paliwal. Petitioner withdrew the petition, and it was dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
VIJENDER SINGH YADAV F/O GAURAV YADAV ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Virender Singh Kadian, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mrs. Bharathi Raju, Central Government Standing Counsel
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
%
O R D E R 15.03.2016
Page 1 of 3
W.P.(C) 779/2016
the petitioner had undergone a medical examination and he was declared as disqualified temporarily on account of ECG abnormality and ‘bilateral in complete sacaralisation of LV5’. The aforesaid findings returned by the Medical Board were duly communicated to the petitioner, who was called upon to appear before the Appeal Medical Board on 21st October, 2015 at the AIR HQ, R.K. Puram, New Delhi.
Page 2 of 3
W.P.(C) 779/2016
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
MARCH 15, 2016
r
Page 3 of 3
W.P.(C) 779/2016
W.P.(C) 779/2016 Page 1 of 3
Vijender Singh Yadav
Union of India
Hima Kohli
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
