Dismissed
B.N.Mishra v. UOI & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/18224/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner failed to appear for hearing across multiple dates despite notice being sent. Court dismissed the writ petition in default and for non-prosecution due to lack of interest shown by the petitioner.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~R-84.
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 18224/2006
¶4
B.N. MISHRA ` ..... Petitioner Through: None
¶5
versus
¶6
UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
¶8
O R D E R % 11.03.2016
¶9
- The present matter has been reflected in the regular cause list since 03.02.2016 and was taken up on several dates, i.e., on 19.02.2016, 24.02.2016, 03.03.2016 and 09.03.2016. On 19.02.2016, counsel for the respondents was requested to give written intimation of the pendency of this case to Mr. Y.S. Chauhan, counsel for the petitioner. On 24.02.2016, counsel for the respondents had informed that he had duly intimated counsel for the petitioner about the pendency of this case. However, none had appeared for the petitioner on 24.02.2016 and same was the position on 03.03.2016 and 09.03.2016.
¶10
W.P.(C) 18224/2006
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
B.N. Mishra
- respondent
UOI And Ors
Coram
AI extract
Hima Kohli
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court