The writ petition challenging recruitment disputes was withdrawn by the petitioner while reserving rights to approach the territorially competent court. The petition was accordingly dismissed.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with leave granted to approach the competent court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
SUDHIR SINGH TEOTIA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Sanjay Dubey and Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Saroj Bidawat with Mr. Sumit Rajput, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 16.03.2016
W.P.(C) 81/2016 Page 1 of 2
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
MARCH 16, 2016
sk/rkb
W.P.(C) 81/2016 Page 2 of 2
Sudhir Singh Teotia
Union of India
Hima Kohli
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
