The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel accepted that the respondents' communication dated 23 August 2016 addressed the petitioner's grievance. The control memorandum was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
PRIYANKA PRASAD AND ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Bijender Singh and Ms. Vidushi, Advs.
versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Ms. Simran Jeet, Advs. for R1. Mr. Umesh Joshi, Adv. for R4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
W.P.(C) 6611/2016
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.4 has handed over a communication dated 23rd August, 2016 to Mr. Bijender Singh learned counsel for the petitioner. On going through the same Mr. Singh states that in terms of the aforesaid communication, the grievance of the petitioner in the petition has been met.
In view of the statement made by Mr. Bijender Singh, the petition is disposed of on the basis of the communication dated 23rd August, 2016, which is taken on record.
CM. NO. 27107/2016
Dismissed as infructuous.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
DECEMBER 05, 2016/ jg
PRIYANKA PRASAD AND ORS
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
