A single-line order dismissing a writ petition as withdrawn and infructous after the petitioner's counsel accepted the respondent's submission that the matter would be decided within four weeks under applicable rules without applying for status quo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~336
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sharat Kapoor and Mr. C.B. Tiwari, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R
% 02.12.2016
W.P.(C) 11291/2016
Pursuant to the order dated 1st December, 2016, Naib Tehsildar, Alipur is present in person. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent on instructions submits that the application of the petitioner under Appendix-VI Rule 14 of the Delhi Land Reforms Rules and Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 CPC shall be decided by the concerned authority within four weeks.
On the submission of Mr. V.P. Rana, that the respondent shall maintain status quo till such time the application is decided, the learned counsel for the respondent states that there is no application filed by the petitioner in that regard before the concerned authority. He also states, if such an application is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered on the next date of hearing, i.e., 6th December, 2016 by the authority concerned. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the aforesaid submission, Mr. Rana does not press the
present writ petition. Same is dismissed as withdrawn.
CM. NO. 44191/2016
Dismissed as infructous.
Dasti to both the parties.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
DECEMBER 02, 2016 jg
Shree Sai Aeronautics Trust (Regd)
Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors
V. Kameswar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
