The petitioner requested to withdraw the writ petition, which was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
W.P.(C) 12997/2015 dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
NEW TRACK DRESSES PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Kochar and Mr. Amol Sinha, Advs.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, 18 (2), NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R
% 06.12.2016
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition.
WP(C) 12997/2015 is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
DECEMBER 06, 2016 /kk
NEW TRACK DRESSES PVT. LTD.
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, 18 (2), NEW DELHI
S. RAVINDRA BHAT
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
