Petitioner withdrew a writ petition challenging a tender issued by South Western Railways. The Court dismissed the petition with liberty to file before the High Court at Karnataka.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file before the High Court at Karnataka.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
M/S HUGHES & HUGHES CHEM LTD ..... Petitioner Through : Mr Siddharth Yadav with Mr Wasim Ashraf, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr Jagjit Singh with Mr Puneet Singh, Advocates for respondent Nos.1 & 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
O R D E R % 21.01.2016
CM 2164/2016 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 528/2016 & CM 2163/2016 (stay)
The learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 & 2, who is present on advance notice states that the subject tender was issued by the South Western Railways at Bengaluru, Karnataka and, therefore, this Court would not have jurisdiction to entertain this writ petition.
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file it before the High Court at Karnataka.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
JANUARY 21, 2016 st
M/S HUGHES & HUGHES CHEM LTD
UNION OF INDIA
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
