S v. Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition following resolution of disputes via an MOU dated 10 May 2016. Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed petition.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition and application dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
$~18
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 5208/2011 & C.M.No.10561/2011
S ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Naveen Kumar Raheja, Advocate.
versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Himanshu Bajaj with Ms.Sakshi Agrawal, Advocates for R-2. Mr.A.N.Haksar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Arijit Mazumdar, Advocate for R- 3 to 6.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R
% 16.05.2016
Learned counsel for the parties state that the disputes between the parties have been resolved by way of Memorandum of Understanding dated 10th May, 2016. The same is taken on record.
In view of the said Memorandum of Understanding having been taken on record, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S
- respondent
Union of India and Ors
Coram
Manmohan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court