Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition filed against the Central Vigilance Commission; the High Court dismissed the petition on the withdrawal.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
30
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
GAURI RISHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ankur Chawla, Advocate with Ms. Kalyani, Advocate.
versus
CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Advocate with Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates for respondent No.1-CVC. Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate with Mr. Vikramaditya, Advocate for GNCT of Delhi. Mr. Vijay Joshi, Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Khanna and Ms. Meenakshi Pandey, Advocates for respondent 4.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 16.05.2016
Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, learned senior counsel for petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition.
Consequently, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
MANMOHAN, J
MAY 16, 2016 js
Gauri Rishi
Central Vigilance Commission and Ors.
Man Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
