Dismissed

Shiv Shanker Yadav v. Delhi Medical Council and Ors.

Delhi HC13 May 2016W.P.(C)/4235/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of this writ petition concerning alleged misconduct by hospital respondents. It directed the Delhi Medical Council to decide the petitioner's representation within six months after granting an opportunity of hearing, clarifying that no opinion was expressed on the merits.

What did the court decide?

The petition was allowed subject to just exceptions and disposed off with a direction to respondent No.1 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 17.03.2016 within a period of six months after

Shiv Shanker Yadav Vs Delhi Medical Council and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

28 $~

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 4235/2016

¶4

SHIV SHANKER YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Virender Sood, Advocate with Mr. Dharmender Sharma, Advocate. versus

¶5

DELHI MEDICAL COUNCIL AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harvinder Oberoi, Advocate for Mr. Devesh Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

¶7

O R D E R % 13.05.2016

¶8

CM Appls. 17905-17906/2016 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 4235/2016

¶9

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶10

W.P.(C) 4235/2016

¶11

Present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-

¶12

“a) Direct the Respondent no.1 to take legal action against to respondent no.2 and 3 through respondent no.2 director and cancel the license of respondent no.3.

¶13

b) Direct the respondent no.2 to refer petitioner to U.S.A. for treatment on the expenses of respondent no.2 to save his life.

¶14

c) Direct the respondent no.2 and 3 to consider compensation to petitioner for his monitory, mentally and physical loss.

¶15

d) To order to shut down the abovesaid money oriented MAX SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL, SAKET to prevent the lives and money of the poor patients/public at large in the interest of justice and human kind.

¶16

e) Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Pass such other or further orders, as this Hon‟ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶17

A perusal of the paper book reveals that petitioner has filed a complaint with respondent No.1-Delhi Medical Council against respondents No.2 and 3 on 17^th March, 2016, but learned counsel for petitioner states that no action has been taken till date.

¶18

Consequently, present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 17^th March, 2016 within a period of six months after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as respondents No.2 and 3.

¶19

This Court clarifies that it has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the controversy. Rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.

¶20

MANMOHAN, J

¶21

MAY 13, 2016 js

Shiv Shanker Yadav v. Delhi Medical Council and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Shanker Yadav v. Delhi Medical Council and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Ray Vs Union of India & Ors.

Jaidal Singh Rawat Vs Food Corporation of India & or

Mohd. Salim Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.

Devender Singh Vs New Delhi Municipal Council

Media Content & Communication Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Manmohan Singh Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Abha Gupta Vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Priya Desh Gupta Vs Dy. Commisioner of Income Tax

Preeti Rana Vs Union of India & Anr.

Master Mohd Hamza Vs Mount Fort School and Ors.

Kuldeep Vats Vs State of National Capital of Delhi and Anr.

Mewa Singh Vs Comissioner of Police and Ors.

Dr (Major) Ajit Pratap Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Devika Singh Vs the Central Information Commission and Ors.