Civil Writ Petition wherein the petitioner challenged the rejection of its application for M.Ed. and Integrated courses by NCTE due to missing NOC. The single judge found no perversity in the order and dismissed the petition.
The writ petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~83
MUTHU MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL TRUST ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Mayank Manish with Mr.Ravi Kant, Advocates.
versus
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR ..... Respondents
Through Mr.Anil Soni with Mr.Naginder Benipal, Advocates for R- 1 & 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R
% 20.01.2016
The present writ petition has been filed challenging decision of respondents taken in 295th Meeting held between 28-30/11/2015 and 01/12/2015 whereby the petitioner’s application for the M.Ed. Course and the B.Sc. BA/B.Ed. Integrated Course was rejected on the ground that NOC from the Tamil Nadu Teachers Education University had not been produced.
Petitioner further seeks to direct respondent-NCTE to permit the processing of the application of the petitioner for the aforesaid course keeping the final recognition pending until the issuance of NOC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that as per NCTE Regulations, there is one more option wherein the NCTE asks the State Government and its functionaries for their recommendations.
Admittedly, the petitioner has not produced the NOC from Tamil Nadu Teachers Education University along with its application form, which it was statutorily bound to produce. The cut-off date for filing of application was 30th June, 2015.
Consequently, on the last date of submission of the application, the petitioner’s application was not complete. Even till date, the petitioner has not challenged the non-furnishing of NOC by the Tamil Nadu Teachers Education University.
Accordingly, this Court finds no perversity or error apparent on the face of the record in the impugned order. The present writ petition is dismissed but with no order as to costs.
MANMOHAN, J
JANUARY 20, 2016 KA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's course application on grounds of non-production of NOC was perversely or arbitrarily imposed?
Muthu Memorial Educational Trust
National Council for Teacher Education
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
