Matter was called twice for restoration proceedings. The petitioner failed to appear. The restoration application was dismissed in default for non-prosecution. As a consequence, the underlying writ petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
..... Respondent
Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR O R D E R % 19.07.2016
C.M. No.10914/2016 (for restoration)
Matter has been called twice. None has appeared for the petitioner.
This is an application filed by the petitioner seeking restoration of the petition. Since none has appeared for the petitioner in spite of matter having been called twice, this application is dismissed in default as also for non-prosecution.
As a consequence the present writ petition is also disposed of.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
JULY 19, 2016
ndn
Jai Ram
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
