This is a one-line order where the High Court of Delhi allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition (W.P.(C) 3784/2016) with liberty to approach the appropriate court, and subsequently dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petitioner was allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
MAHENDRA PANDEY ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Abhijeet Sinha, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms.Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr.Kushal Kumar, Advocate for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file an appropriate proceeding in accordance with the law.
With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition and the application are dismissed as withdrawn.
MANMOHAN, J
MAY 03, 2016 KA
Mahendra Pandey
Union of India
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
