Dinesh Kumar Gupta v. Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
DINESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Harsh K.Sharma with Mr.Rajinder Singh Rana, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Atul Batra, Advocate for R- 1/UOI. Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC with Ms.Pratishta Vij, Advocate for R-2. Ms.Sonia Mathur with Mr.Sushil Kumar Dubey, Advocates for CBI. Mr.Gautam Narayan for R-5. Mr.Anuj Aggarwal with Mr.Shubhanshu Gupta, Advocates for R-6. Mr.Satyakam, ASC for R-7.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 03.05.2016
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition and the application are dismissed as withdrawn.
MANMOHAN, J
MAY 03, 2016 KA
Dinesh Kumar Gupta
Union of India
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court