Union of India & Anr. v. Amul Chinlal Ahuja
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the writ petition as instructed by counsel. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11.
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC, Ms. Gunjan Bansal, Advocate along with Mr. Roopam Ranjan, Assistant Section Officer, MHRD.
versus
AMUL CHINLAL AHUJA ..... Respondent Through Nemo.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 02.03.2016
Learned counsel for the Union of India states that he has instruction to
withdraw the present writ petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
MARCH 02, 2016 VKR
Union of India & Anr.
Amul Chinlal Ahuja
Sanjiv Khanna
Najmi Wazeeri
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court