A writ petition seeking permission to withdraw is dismissed with liberty to file appropriate proceedings. The bench clarified it has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
versus MINISTRY OF RAILWAY & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Jagjit Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R % 01.03.2016
After some hearing learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law as per the legal ratio propounded in the impugned order dated 7th January, 2016.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as
prayed for. We clarify that we have not expressed any opinion on merits.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
MARCH 01, 2016/NA
M.S. SUNIL
MINISTRY OF RAILWAY
SANJIV KHANNA
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
