Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition which was allowed by this court, resulting in dismissal of the petition and rendering the caveat infructous.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; Caveat rendered infructous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CENTRAL COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH IN UNANI MEDICINE
..... Petitioner Through Mr. C. Hari Shankar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S. Sunil, Advocate.
versus
HAKIM MAHBOOB US SALAM & ANR ..... Respondent Through Ms. Harvinder Oberoi with Ms. Neha Garg, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Shiva Lakshmi, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 01.03.2016
W.P.(C) 1754/2016
Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner on
instructions states that he would like to withdraw the present writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Caveat No.181/2016
In view of the statement made, the caveat is rendered
infructous.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
MARCH 01, 2016 NA
CENTRAL COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH IN UNANI MEDICINE
HAKIM MAHBOOB US SALAM
SANJIV KHANNA
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
