Disposed

Naveen Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC22 Mar 2016W.P.(C)/2564/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking review of the petitioner's medical disqualification. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach respondents for convening a Review Medical Board within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to file representation for Review Medical Board within two weeks; respondents directed to convene board within four weeks.

Naveen Kumar Vs Union of India & Ors. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~21

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2564/2016 & CM No.10884/2016

¶4

NAVEEN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Sachit Arora, Advocate

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Vinod Kr. Tiwari, Advocate

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

¶8

O R D E R % 22.03.2016

¶9

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 12.9.2015, issued by the respondents/DIG, CRPF, Jharoda Kalan, New Delhi, declaring him as permanently unfit for selection to the post of Constable (GD) on medical grounds, which have not been specifically stated in the said order.

¶10

Counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance copy, states that prior to filing the present petition, the petitioner ought to have approached the respondents with a request for convening a Review Medical Board to re-examine his medical condition and had he filed such an application, the same would have been considered as per the prescribed procedure.

¶11

In view of the aforesaid submission, counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, while reserving the right of the petitioner to approach the respondents with a request for convening a Review Medical Board, to re-consider his medical condition.

¶12

W.P.(C) No. 2564/2016 Page 1 of 2

¶13

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of, along with the pending application, with liberty granted to the petitioner to file a representation with the respondents for convening a Review Medical Board to re-consider his medical condition within two weeks. The respondents shall convene a Review Medical Board within four weeks from the date of receipt of such a representation from the petitioner.

¶14

Needless to state that the respondents shall communicate the result of the Review Medical Board to the petitioner. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision that may be taken by the respondents on the basis of the recommendations of the Review Medical Board, he shall be entitled to seek his remedy, if so advised, in accordance with law.

¶15

HIMA KOHLI, J SUNIL GAUR, J

¶16

MARCH 22, 2016 sk/ap

¶17

W.P.(C) No. 2564/2016 Page 2 of 2

Naveen Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naveen Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhupendra Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Charan Singh Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Devi Singh Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Ram Avtar Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Mohd. Kasif Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Ashwani Abhilashi Vs University of Delhi & Anr.

Wular Trust Vs Addl.Director of Wealth Tax(Exemp.)& Ors.

Tista Trust Vs Addl.Dir.of Wealth Tax(Exemp.) & Ors.

Subrata Ghose Vs Union of India and Anr.

Major Arvind Joshi Vs UOI & Anr.

Bhuri Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

S Jayakumar Nair Vs Union of India and Ors.

Saraswati Thapa Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sajjan Kumar Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.