The Court disposed of a writ petition seeking directions for promotion benefits and quashing of an office order, granting liberty to file a substantive representation instead.
Liberty granted to file substantive representation; petition disposed with intimation of decision timeline.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
BHURI SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.P. S Dalal & Mr. Ranjit Singh, Advocates
versus
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R
%
21.03.2016
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) 2416/2016
grant of the first, second and third ACP.
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
MARCH 21, 2016 r
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 2416/2016
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant liberty to file a substantive representation regarding ACP and quashing of an office order?
Whether the representations submitted by the petitioner adequately addressed the impugned office order?
Bhuri Singh
Union of India
CRPF
Hima Kohli
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
