Major Arvind Joshi v. UOI & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the petition against Regulation 423 quashing request; the High Court disposed of the petition but left the legal question on the regulation's illegality open.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed; question of law on regulation's legality left open.
What the court decided
$~R-102.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 2139/2007
MAJOR ARVIND JOSHI ..... Petitioner Through: Dr. L.S. Chaudhary, Advocate with Ms. Swati Guha Mazumdar and Ms. Reema Bhola, Advocates
versus
UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Prashant Shivrajan and Mr. Harsh Singhal, Advocates for Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 21.03.2016
- The petitioner has filed the present petition praying inter alia for quashing the proviso to Regulation 423 (Annexure P-1) and for restraining the respondents from passing any adverse orders against him.
- Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has superannuated from the Indian Army in the year 2015, whereafter he has been re-engaged by the Army and in view of the changed circumstances, he does not wish to press the present petition, more so since in the interregnum, the Guwahati High Court has set aside the conviction order dated 31.10.2006 passed against him by the Sessions Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Major Arvind Joshi
- respondent
UOI And Ors
Coram
Hima Kohli
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court