The High Court of Delhi permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition pending filing of a statutory appeal against military punishment under Section 164 of the Army Act, 1950, and dismissed the writ petition.
Withdrawal of the writ petition permitted upon filing a statutory appeal within one week; writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
SAPPER MANOJ KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. S.M. Dalal, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
W.P.(C) 8714/2014 Page 1 of 2
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
MARCH 21, 2016
sk/ap
W.P.(C) 8714/2014 Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of in the absence of an exercise of statutory appeal under Section 164 of the Army Act, 1950.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sapper Manoj Kumar
Union of India
Hima Kohli
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
