The court issued notices. The respondent's counsel stated they had sent written intimation of the petition's pendency to the petitioner's advocate. The court reserved, stating that no adverse orders would be passed in the interest of justice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-100
SH. PRRAMVEER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: None
versus
DIRECTOR GENERAL (CISF) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 16.03.2016
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
MARCH 16, 2016
s
Sh. Praramveer Singh
Director General (CISF)
Anr.
Hima Kohli
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
