Petitioner withdrew the writ petition as the relief was already granted during the pendency of the proceedings. Court disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-40
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate for respondent-UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R
% 09.02.2016
contacted his client and obtained instructions to the effect that during the pendency of the present petition, the petitioner has been granted the relief as prayed for in the present petition and therefore, he does not wish to pursue the present petition any further.
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
FEBRUARY 09, 2016 s
Sub-Inspector Rajender Pal Singh
Union of India
Hima Kohli
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
