Preeti Bahl v. UOI
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner relinquished the pursuit of limited relief regarding quashing of a letter rejecting a sexual harassment complaint. The petition was disposed of as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
Nil
What the court decided
$~R-20
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 12698/2005 PREETI BAHL ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Jemtibe Ao, Advocate
- versus
UOI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber and Mr. Manu Padalia, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R % 09.02.2016
- Pursuant to the order dated 1st February, 2016, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has obtained instructions from her client to the effect that in view of the long passage of time since the date of institution of the present petition, wherein the petitioner has asked for a limited relief of quashing of the letter dated 27th June, 2005 rejecting her complaint of sexual harassment levelled against the respondent No.4, she is not inclined to pursue the same any further.
- The present petition is disposed of as not pressed.
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Preeti Bahl
- respondent
UOI & ORS.
Coram
Hima Kohli
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court