The High Court directed the petitioner to file afresh after observing that the petition failed to reveal the complete picture of internal factional disputes and lacked necessary supporting papers regarding rival claims.
Petition rejected; counsel permitted to file afresh after understanding the matter with all requisite papers.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
Versus
UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mrs. Bharathi Raju, Adv. for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R % 16.03.2016
CM No.9662/2016 (for exemption)
W.P.(C) 2234/2016 & CM No.9663/2016 (for stay)
W.P.(C) 2234/2016
Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3
was held to be invalid by the High Court. However that order has also not been produced.
No costs.
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J
MARCH 16, 2016 ‘gsr’..
W.P.(C) 2234/2016
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition regarding internal factional disputes and election results can be adjudicated without all claiming factions being impleaded.
ALL INDIA CARROM FEDERATION
UNION OF INDIA
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
