Petitioner challenged tax recovery by NDMC for March 2014. Court held petition infructuous as coercive steps on subsequent period were stayed by a concurrent Division Bench. Disposed without costs.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
APEEJAY SURRENDRA PARK HOTELS LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. B.B. Jain, Adv.
Versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arjun Mitra and Mr. Abhishek Misra, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R
% 17.03.2016
No costs.
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
MARCH 17, 2016/ bs..
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Apeejay Surrendra Park Hotels Ltd.
New Delhi Municipal Council
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
