The court dismissed the appeal in default due to the non-appearance of the appellant while the respondent reported recovering possession of the premises. No substantive legal issues were resolved.
The appeal was dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
REKHA GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: None.
Versus
KAUSTAV SAHA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Niranjan Saha, R-3 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW O R D E R % 15.03.2016
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
MARCH 15, 2016 bs
Rekha Gupta
Kaustav Saha
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
