Petitioner sought permission to withdraw writ petition; court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
VINAY CHADHA AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE M/S 121 BRANDS
..... Petitioner
Through Mr S.S. Tripathi with Mr G.S. Bagga, Advocates.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr Sanjay Poddar, Sr Advocate with Mr Mukesh Gupta and Mr P.S. Jha, Advocates for respondent No.1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 03.03.2016
CM No.8163/2016 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 1908/2016 & CM No.8162/2016 (stay)
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this
writ petition. Permission is granted.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
MARCH 03, 2016 st
Vinay Chadha
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
