Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, excluding liquor vend issues. The court granted permission and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; permission granted to file a fresh writ petition excluding liquor vend issues.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RASHTRIYA VIKAS SAMITI (REGD.) ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr Sunil Kumar, Advocate
versus
THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC for GNCTD/R-1 & R-2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
O R D E R % 02.03.2016
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appropriate writ petition raising the issues pertaining to misuse of property and parking problems/nuisance and fire safety in the area. That the writ petition shall not include the issue of liquor vends which was specifically raised in this petition and does not survive any longer as the vends are beyond the stipulated 100 metre distance.
This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
MARCH 02, 2016 ‘rs’
Rashtriya Vikas Samiti (Regd.)
The Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
