The High Court of Delhi dismissed FAO(OS) 64/2016 as withdrawn upon the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants to withdraw the appeal. No substantive legal issues were discussed.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
RUCHI BANSAL & ORS ..... Appellants Through Mr Subhash C. Jindal, Advocate.
versus
ASHWANI KUMAR ARORA & ORS ..... Respondents Through None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 02.03.2016
CM No.7656/2016 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
FAO(OS) 64/2016, CM No.7657/2016 (for condonation of delay) & CM No.7655/2016 (stay)
The learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
MARCH 02, 2016 st
RUCHI BANSAL
ASHWANI KUMAR ARORA
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
