A writ petition seeking directions to the respondents to consider the petitioner's name for a Scientist-B post was dismissed as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
None; petition and application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
DIPALI AHUJA ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Pratima N. Chauhan, Adv.
versus
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Ramesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Dev P. Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH
O R D E R
% 09.03.2016
The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 read with Article 16 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the respondents to consider the name of the petitioner for the post of Scientist-B (Chemistry).
After some arguments, Ms.Pratima N. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s representation dated 08.02.2016 has been rejected by the respondents on 25.02.2016. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition as well as application with liberty to avail appropriate legal remedy.
As prayed, the petition as well as application are dismissed as withdrawn.
V.P.VAISH, J
MARCH 09, 2016/ gm
Dipali Ahuja
Bureau of Indian Standards & Anr
V.P. Vaish
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
