Petitioner challenged removal from a hawking site claiming violation of the Street Vendors Act, 2014. The Court held that eviction protection applies pending survey but no further orders were needed as respondents claimed no contravention occurred. Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~65
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 12.02.2016
Petitioner has alleged that he is squatter/vendor opposite Kendriya
Bhandar, Sector-1 Market, R. K. Puram, New Delhi. Petitioner alleges that Town Vending Committee under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 (for short, ‘the Act’) has yet not been constituted, but respondents are removing him from his hawking site. It is contended that under Section 3(3) of the Act, protection is granted to the street vendors from eviction, till survey is done and petitioner is relocated. It is prayed that respondents be restrained from removing the petitioner from his respective hawking site.
It may be noted that various factual aspects have to be considered in
such like matters. Whether petitioner is squatting at the place, which he alleges to have been squatting is one of the important factors to be considered. Whether the said vending activity causes any obstruction in the free movements on the streets/pavements by the pedestrians and/or vehicles; is another factor to be considered. Security perspective has also to be kept in mind. All these questions can be ascertained by the concerned authority under the Act.
Section 3 of the Act reads as under :-
“3(1) The Town Vending Committee shall, within such period and in such manner as may be specified in the scheme, conduct a survey of all existing street vendors, within the area under its jurisdiction, and subsequent survey shall be carried out at least once in every five years.
(2) The Town Vending Committee shall ensure that all existing street vendors, identified in the survey, are accommodated in the vending zones subject to a norm conforming to two and half per cent. of the population of the ward or zone or town or city, as the case may be, in accordance with the plan for street vending and the holding capacity of the vending zones.
(3) No street vendor shall be evicted or, as the case may be, relocated till the survey specified under sub-section (1) has been completed and the certificate of vending is issued to all street vendors.”
Respondents are expected to abide by the laws of the land and no
directions in this regard are necessary, inasmuch as, counsels for the
respondents submit that no such action, in contravention of Section 3(3) of the Act, is being taken.
It may further be noted that a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 20th August, 2014 passed in W.P. (C) 4303/2014 tilted National Association of Street Vendors of India vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors . has observed thus:-
“Furthermore, insofar as street vending is concerned, the subject matter is entirely covered by the Street Vendors Act, 2014. The rights and obligations of street vendors, requirements of cleanliness and public hygiene as well as the formation of the Town Vending Committees have been specified in the said Street Vendors Act, 2014. Chapter 8 of the said Act also provides for the prevention of harassment of street vendors. Section 3 of the said Act provides for the conduct of a survey and Section 3 (3) thereof stipulates that no street vendor shall be evicted till the survey has been completed. It is an admitted position that the survey has not yet been completed. Therefore, the provisions of Section 3(3) of the Street Vendors Act, 2014 shall be applicable and no street vendor can be evicted. Section 33 of the Street Vendors Act, 2014 also gives it overriding effect over other laws.”
Accordingly, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ
petition and the same is disposed of with the above observations. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous.
FEBRUARY 12, 2016/ dk
A.K. PATHAK, J.
3 issues framed by the court
Whether Section 3(3) of the Street Vendors Act, 2014, protects the petitioner from eviction pending survey completion.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a stay on removal from the hawking site.
Whether the Town Vending Committee has been constituted under the Act.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
National Association of Street Vendors of India vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and OrsRelied on¶17
W.P. (C) 4303/2014
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Kishan
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
Anr
A.K. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
