Disposed

Laxmi Narain v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

Delhi HC12 Feb 2016W.P.(C)/1193/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner alleged evictions without a completed survey under the Street Vendors Act, 2014. The Court observed the statutory protections but noted respondent counsel submitted no contravention occurred. Consequently, no further orders were issued and the petition was disposed of without substantive adjudication on the eviction claim.

What did the court decide?

No restraining order granted; petition disposed of with no further orders required.

Laxmi Narain Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~63

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 1193/2016 and CM Nos.5237/2016 & 5238/2016 LAXMI NARAIN ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Ramesh K. Mishra, Adv. versus

¶4

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Roshal Lal Goel, Adv. with Ms. Anju Gupta, Adv. for SDMC/R-1. Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC, GNCTD/R-2.

¶5

CORAM:

¶6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 12.02.2016

¶7

Petitioner has alleged that he is squatter/vendor at pavement opposite

¶8

Vinay Bhawan, Street No.19, Shop No.M-4, Madangir, New Delhi. Petitioner alleges that Town Vending Committee under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 (for short, ‘the Act’) has yet not been constituted, but respondents are removing him from his hawking site. It is contended that under Section 3(3) of the Act, protection is granted to the street vendors from eviction, till survey is done and petitioner is relocated. It is prayed that respondents be restrained from removing the petitioner from his respective hawking site.

¶9

It may be noted that various factual aspects have to be considered in

¶10

such like matters. Whether petitioner is squatting at the place, which he alleges to have been squatting is one of the important factors to be considered. Whether the said vending activity causes any obstruction in the free movements on the streets/pavements by the pedestrians and/or vehicles; is another factor to be considered. Security perspective has also to be kept in mind. All these questions can be ascertained by the concerned authority under the Act.

¶11

Section 3 of the Act reads as under :-

¶12

“3(1) The Town Vending Committee shall, within such period and in such manner as may be specified in the scheme, conduct a survey of all existing street vendors, within the area under its jurisdiction, and subsequent survey shall be carried out at least once in every five years.

¶13

(2) The Town Vending Committee shall ensure that all existing street vendors, identified in the survey, are accommodated in the vending zones subject to a norm conforming to two and half per cent. of the population of the ward or zone or town or city, as the case may be, in accordance with the plan for street vending and the holding capacity of the vending zones.

¶14

(3) No street vendor shall be evicted or, as the case may be, relocated till the survey specified under sub-section (1) has been completed and the certificate of vending is issued to all street vendors.”

¶15

Respondents are expected to abide by the laws of the land and no

¶16

directions in this regard are necessary, inasmuch as, counsels for the

¶17

respondents submit that no such action, in contravention of Section 3(3) of the Act, is being taken.

¶18

It may further be noted that a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 20^th August, 2014 passed in W.P. (C) 4303/2014 tilted National Association of Street Vendors of India vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors . has observed thus:-

¶19

“Furthermore, insofar as street vending is concerned, the subject matter is entirely covered by the Street Vendors Act, 2014. The rights and obligations of street vendors, requirements of cleanliness and public hygiene as well as the formation of the Town Vending Committees have been specified in the said Street Vendors Act, 2014. Chapter 8 of the said Act also provides for the prevention of harassment of street vendors. Section 3 of the said Act provides for the conduct of a survey and Section 3 (3) thereof stipulates that no street vendor shall be evicted till the survey has been completed. It is an admitted position that the survey has not yet been completed. Therefore, the provisions of Section 3(3) of the Street Vendors Act, 2014 shall be applicable and no street vendor can be evicted. Section 33 of the Street Vendors Act, 2014 also gives it overriding effect over other laws.”

¶20

Accordingly, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ

¶21

petition and the same is disposed of with the above observations. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous.

¶22

FEBRUARY 12, 2016/ dk

¶23

A.K. PATHAK, J.

Laxmi Narain v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Laxmi Narain v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.K. Anand & Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Ajit Kumar Singh Vs UOI and Ors.

Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Vs M/S Parasrampuria Synthetics Ltd. & Ors.

M/S Krishan & Co. Vs UOI & Ors.

Pushpanjali Farm Owners and Residents Welfare Association, Bijwasan Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi (South) & Ors.

Moti Kumari Vs Secretary General, Supreme Court of India

Abhishek Prakash Vs State Govt. of NCT Delhi, India & Anr.

Mustajab Ali Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Ekta Mittal & Anr. Vs Rajat Mittal

Anil Sachedeva Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Nitin Vs Deepak Mohan Spolia & Ors.

Mangal Mishra and Ar Vs Govt. of NCT Delhi and Ors.

Avinash Kumar Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

Ram Kishan Vs South Delhi Municipal Corportion and Anr.