Petitioners sought to withdraw the writ petition to pursue remedies before the SDM. The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition as withdrawn, noting the counsel's statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
MAHINDER SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Bhagabati Prasad, Adv.
versus
SDM (SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE), VASANT VIHAR
..... Respondent Through: Mr.Hem Kumar, Adv. for SDM, GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 11644/2016
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the applications filed by the petitioners on 12th April, 2007 and on 23rd April, 2013 are listed before the respondent/SDM on 20th January, 2017 and accordingly, wishes to withdraw the writ petition to pursue the remedy before the SDM.
Noting the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
DECEMBER 09, 2016 RN
Mahinder Singh & Anr.
SDM (Sub-Divisional Magistrate), Vasant Vihar
V. Kameswar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
