The court dismissed a rectification application as withdrawn. The petitioner was allowed liberty to seek remedies available in law if aggrieved by the Fee Anomaly Committee's order.
petitioner at liberty to seek other remedies in law if aggrieved by the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
approach the Fee Anomaly Committee by way of a rectification application. The petition as well as connected application is dismissed as withdrawn.
The petitioner shall be at liberty to seek such remedy, as available in
law, if the petitioner is still aggrieved by the order , of the Fee Anomaly
Committee. . , ^
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
DEtEMBER 14,2016/aA:
• t
Petitioner
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
