Two writ petitions challenging NCTE unit allocation orders were dismissed as withdrawn by petitioners upon respondents' submission regarding appealability under Section 18 of the NCTE Act.
None; petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14 & 15
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BISHNUPUR BIRHAMBIR EDUCATION TRUST & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv.
versus
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Yashvardhan and Mr. Himanshu Kushreshtha, Advs.
AND
SONAMUKHI MAHESHWAR EDUCATIONAL & SOCIAL WELFARE TRUST AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv.
versus
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, Standing Counsel for respondent no.1/NCTE.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 07.12.2016
Learned counsel appearing of the respondents state that, orders dated 2nd May, 2016, whereby one basic unit was granted against the application
of the petitioners for two units are appealable under Section 18 of the NCTE Act.
In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the respondents, Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for the petitioners on instructions seeks to withdraw the present petitions.
The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Dasti.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
DECEMBER 07, 2016 /jg
BISHNUPUR BIRHAMBIR EDUCATION TRUST & ANR
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR
SONAMUKHI MAHESHWAR EDUCATIONAL & SOCIAL WELFARE TRUST AND ANR
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
