Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn after production of the enrolment file.
Petitioner granted leave to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
RAHUL DUTTA ..... Petitioner
Through Petitioner in person.
versus
BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Aman Nandrajog, Advocate for respondent No.1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 14.12.2016
The original enrolment file of the petitioner has been produced by the respondent No.1.
The petitioner, who appears in person, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
DECEMBER 14, 2016 st
Rahul Dutta
Bar Council of Delhi
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
