Allowed
Mukesh Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/11201/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R
% 09.12.2016
The petitioner, who appears in person, prays for leave to delete respondent No.3 from the array of parties.
In view of the above, the respondent No.3 is deleted from the array of parties. Let amended memo of parties be filed within two days.
The petitioner seeks disposal of the representation/application dated 28.07.2016, filed by the petitioner, seeking prosecution sanction against Dr. Manoranjan, the then Secretary (Steel).
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the representation is under consideration and is likely to be disposed of within a period of six weeks.
In view of the above, no further orders are called for in the petition. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
It is expected that the respondents shall dispose of the application of the petitioner within a period of six weeks.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
DECEMBER 09, 2016 st
MUKESH KUMAR
UNION OF INDIA
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court