The High Court of Delhi disposed of the writ petition filed by Mohd. Maqbool as not pressed after the respondent filed a status report confirming action in accordance with law.
Writ petition disposed of as not pressed; miscellaneous application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the status report
filed by the respondent no.1 wherein it has been stated that action has been
taken in accordance with law, writ petition is not pressed.
Disposed of as not pressed. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
FEBRUARY 10, 2016/ dk
Mohd. Maqbool
The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (South Zone)
A.K. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
