Dismissed
Rohit Khera v. Komal Gandhi Khera
Delhi HCCM(M)/135/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petition allowed on leave to withdraw, disposed of as infructuous. Order admits no substantive legal principles or issues for citation.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~33
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CM(M) 135/2016 ROHIT KHERA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. M. S. Maini, Adv. with petitioner in person.
¶4
versus
¶5
KOMAL GANDHI KHERA ..... Respondent Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 09.02.2016
¶6
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for petitioner, on
¶7
instructions from petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
¶8
Disposed of as withdrawn. Miscellaneous application is disposed of
¶9
as infructuous.
¶10
A.K. PATHAK, J.
¶11
FEBRUARY 09, 2016/ dk
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Rohit Khara
- respondent
Komal Gandhi Khara
Coram
AI extract
A.K. Pathak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court