Disposed¶33

Ganesh Prasad Shukla v. Union of India

Chhattisgarh HC21 Apr 2026WPS/3488/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh HC Bilaspur; WPS No. 3488 of 2026; decided 22.04.2026; Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge (sole bench); petitioners led by Ganesh Prasad Shukla (15 petitioners, advocates Varun Sharma); respondents: Union of India (Labour & Employment), EPFO Regional Office Raipur, Assistant PF Commissioner, Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadi Durg; counsel: Shweta Rai (UoI), Sunil Pillai (EPFO); writ petition disposed of on voluntary withdrawal with liberty to file appropriate petition; no statutory provisions, cited cases, issues or holdings; marked NAFR.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file an appropriate petition on behalf of the petitioners. ¶33

Ganesh Prasad Shukla Vs Union of India — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 / 2

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 3488 of 2026

¶5

1 - Ganesh Prasad Shukla S/o Ramadhar Shukla Aged About 67 Years R/o House No 14/1 Parijat Talpuri Near Saint Thomas College Ruabandha Sector Pragati Nagar Bhilai District- Durg (C.G.)

¶6

2 - Seuk Ram Sahu S/o. Bise Lal Sahu Aged About 66 Years R/o. 377, Shiv Chowk, Street Pole, Dundera, Utai, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.)

¶7

3 - Ramkumar Dubey S/o. Jhumuk Lal Dubey Aged About 66 Years R/o. Ward No. 05, Pandeypara, Block No. 10, Balod District- Balod (C.G.)

¶8

4 - Yogendra Dhar Diwan S/o. Ramanuj Aged About 63 Years R/o. 35, Ward No. 58, 1, Pushpak Nagar, Nehru Nagar West, Motilal Nehru Nagar, Bhilai District- Durg (C.G.)

¶9

5 - Smt. Rakhi Ganguly W/o. Shri Shankar Nath Ganguly Aged About 68 Years R/o. 3e, Street 40, Sector-06, Ward No. 48, Civic Center Bhilai DistrictDurg (C.G.)

¶10

6 - Uma Kumar Sahu S/o. Ramanand Sahu R/o. G-10/17, Chouhan Town, Nehru Nagar, Bhilai District- Durg (C.G.)

¶11

7 - Dayalu Ram Yadav S/o. Dukhuwa Ram Aged About 58 Years R/o. Hirapur, Balod District- Balod (C.G.)

¶12

8 - Mohan Lal Sahu S/o. M Sahu Aged About 54 Years R/o. Ward No. 11, Near Karma Chowk, Amleshwardih, Amlesar, Sankra, Durg (C.G.)

¶13

9 - Narendra Kumar Sao S/o. Khileshwar Prasad Aged About 60 Years Ward No. 45, R/o. Kamla Collage Road, Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.)

¶14

10 - Surendra Singh Bhuwal S/o. Chandraman Singh Aged About 62 Years R/o. D-11, Ralas Royal Park, Phase 1, Kumhari Patan Raod, Near Kaiwalya Dham Temple, Parsada, Kumhari Durg (C.G.)

¶15

11 - Tomas Kurian S/o. K.K. Kurian Aged About 54 Years R/o. Plot No. B5, Ward No. 20, Near Shiv Mandir, Sarojini Nagar, Dhanora, District- Durg (C.G.)

¶16

2 / 2

¶17

12 - Ramesh Kumar Rajput S/o. Sahdev Singh Rajput Aged About 51 Years R/o. Village Patharra, Po. Jiya, District- Bemetara (C.G.)

¶18

13 - Chandrakant Soni S/o. Atmaram Soni Aged About 56 Years R/o. Ward No. 10, Near B.T.I. Bemetara, District- Bemetara (C.G.)

¶19

14 - Satyendra Kumar Vaide S/o. Sukhram Vaide Aged About 53 Years R/o. House No. 175, Ward No. 16, Near Ganga Sagar Talab, Shikari Para, Balod District- Balod (C.G.)

¶20

15 - Dev Kumar Thakur S/o. Paras Ram Thakur Aged About 56 Years R/o. Ward No. 15, Near Samta Hospital, Ram Nagar, Dondi-Lohara, District- Balod (C.G.)

¶21

... Petitioner(s)

¶22

Versus

¶23

1 - Union Of India Through The Secretary Department Of Labour And Employment Shram Shakti Bhawan Rafi Marg New Delhi (New Delhi)

¶24

2 - Employees Provident Fund Organization (Epfo) Through Its Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Regional Office Block -D Scheme - 32 Indira Gandhi Commercial Complex Pandri Raipur (C.G.)

¶25

3 - Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Regional Office Block- D Scheme -32 Indira Gandhi Commercial Complex Pandri Raipur (C.G.)

¶26

4 - Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadi Durg Through Its Chief Executive Officer Durg (C.G.)

¶27

... Respondent(s)

¶28

For Petitioners : Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Ms. Shweta Rai, Advocate For Respondent No. 2 & 3 : Mr. Sunil Pillai, Advocate

¶29

Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge

¶30

ORDER ON BOARD

¶31

22.04.2026

¶32

1. In view of the objection raised by counsel for respondent No. 2 and 3, counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty file appropriate petition on behalf of the petitioners.

¶33

2. In view of the above submission made, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty as prayed for.

¶34

Sd/-

¶35

Saurabh

¶36

(Parth Prateem Sahu) JUDGE

Ganesh Prasad Shukla v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesh Prasad Shukla v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Siddharth Bharti Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Sati Soni Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dr. Ashok Kumar Sambhakar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Prahlad Singh Agariya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ramlochan Vaishnav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Pushpa Baiga Vs State of Chhattisgarh