Dismissed¶22

Pushpa Baiga v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC21 Apr 2026WPS/13878/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; WPS No. 13878 of 2025; 2026:CGHC:18498; decided 22/04/2026; Parth Prateem Sahu, J.; petitioner Pushpa Baiga; respondents State of Chhattisgarh (Department of Higher Education), Director/Directorate of Higher Education, Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board; advocates Kaushal Yadav, Shakshi Bajpayee, Avinash Singh; writ petition dismissed as infructuous after grievances redressed; pending interlocutory applications disposed of; NAFR.

What did the court decide?

In view of the submission that the petitioner's grievances stand redressed, the writ petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as such. ¶22

Pushpa Baiga Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed byRAVI SHANKARMANDAVI Date: 2026.04.2813:29:31 +0530

¶3

2026:CGHC:18498

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPS No. 13878 of 2025

¶7

1 - Pushpa Baiga D/o Shiv Charan Baiga, Aged About 21 Years R/o Chutki, Post- Bahrasi, Tehsil- Bharatpur, District Koriya (C.G.)

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

2 - Director, Directorate Of Higher Education, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶12

3 - Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, Through Secretary, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶13

... Respondent(s)

¶14

(Cause title is taken from CIS)

¶15

For Petitioner	:Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Advocate
For State/Respondents No.1 & 2	:Ms. Shakshi Bajpayee, Panel Lawyer
For Respondent No.3	:Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate

¶16

SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge

¶17

Order on Board

¶18

22/04/2026

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that grievances raised by the petitioner has been redressed, therefore, this petition has become infructuous.

¶20

¶21